Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
No, the software!
-----Original Message-----
From: ryan pogge <ryanpogge@hotmail.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Friday, February 27, 1998 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
>
>huh? make it for the 86? um.... if its for mbus then any calc on the
>network could use it...
>
>>From listown@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Fri Feb 27 16:38:42 1998
>>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
>> by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (8.8.8/8.8.7) id BAA09775
>> for ti-hardware-outgoing; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 01:35:00 +0100
>>From: "Robert Brack" <reb@netride.com>
>>To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Subject: Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
>>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:33:52 -0500
>>Message-ID: <01bd43cf$c7fa41c0$76d628cf@robert>
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>>X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>Precedence: list
>>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>>Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>>
>>
>>Who cares about the 85, make one for the 86 :-) Just kidding. Please
>do
>>though.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Osma Suominen <ozone@clinet.fi>
>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Friday, February 27, 1998 12:46 PM
>>Subject: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
>>
>>
>>>
>>>ryan pogge wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have found that it is possible to have an I2C controlled LCD
>modual.
>>>> Mbus could use this maybee?
>>>
>>>Yes, why not. It should support all of the functions in the I2C
>protocol.
>>>In case something is missing, I'll add it if it's possible.
>>>
>>>I've thought about porting the MBus routines to be usable with the
>Usgard
>>>shell instead of ZShell. Among other benefits, the routines could then
>be
>>>distributed as precompiled .obj libraries, to facilitate programming.
>>>The secondary text memory hack would no longer be needed to achieve
>high
>>>speeds because of the advanced memory management in Usgard. However,
>MBus
>>>applications would then be incompatible with ZShell and other TI-85
>>>shells, unless they support Usgard applications. I could of course
>keep
>>>two separate versions of the routines, one for ZShell and the other
>one
>>>for Usgard, but updating two separate distributions would be a bit
>>>inconvenient.
>>>
>>>What are your thoughts about limiting MBus to Usgard on the 85?
>>>
>>>-Ozone
>>>
>>>--
>>>*** Osma Suominen *** ozone@clinet.fi *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone
>***
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>