Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
But it's getting calcs to recognise their own string, and to make sure it
got sent to the RIGHT person, etc.
- Jon Olson
--
"Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!"
-- Bill Gates, 1981
"Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM."
-- Bill Gates, 1996
"Nobody will ever need Windows 95."
-- logical conclusion
-----Original Message-----
From: MaxxKills@aol.com <MaxxKills@aol.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, February 07, 1998 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
>
>What? are you saying this would slow it down that much? Its just a small
>string, it would not decrease the speed at all really.
>
>Lee
>
>
>In a message dated 98-02-07 17:32:33 EST, you write:
>
><< I'd like to see anyone happy with ~100baud. You would also have to
write
> an ASM program to do it since the calc normally will respond with
> handshake.
>
> Btw, normal transfers are ~12000baud...
>
> >Each calc would have to have a label, such as "A" or even better
> >"user@ticalc.net" or something like that, stored as a string, and the
sender
> >would have to label what user to send to such as "maxx@ticalc.net" and
then
> >all the calculators get the string before they recieve the message, if
the 2
> >strings match, it will start d/l the message.
> >
> >Lee
> >>
>
Follow-Ups: