Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
From: MaxxKills@aol.com
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 17:36:38 EST
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


What? are you saying this would slow it down that much? Its just a small
string, it would not decrease the speed at all really.

Lee


In a message dated 98-02-07 17:32:33 EST, you write:

<< I'd like to see anyone happy with ~100baud.  You would also have to write
 an ASM program to do it since the calc normally will respond with
 handshake.
 
 Btw, normal transfers are ~12000baud...
 
 >Each calc would have to have a label, such as "A" or even better
 >"user@ticalc.net" or something like that, stored as a string, and the sender
 >would have to label what user to send to such as "maxx@ticalc.net" and then
 >all the calculators get the string before they recieve the message, if the 2
 >strings match, it will start d/l the message.
 >
 >Lee
  >>

Prev: Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
Next: Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread