Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)
From: Brenda Hughes <hughesb@mail.mem.bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 09:13:41 -0600
Organization: Briarcrest
References: <v0211010ab10193795de6@[206.149.127.65]>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Grant Stockly wrote:
> 
> >The signal can not be sent to specific calculators (No addressing).  It can
> >send at a slow rate if the handshaking is ignored.  The correct answer is,
> >sort-of.
> 
> Well, the anwser would realy be no.  The reason for handshaking was so that
> the calculator could have a chance to record vat, or do things with the
> byte before getting another.  It would be yes, but at about 100 baud.


Is there a way for the calc to have somthing like an IP address so that
it would only transfer to one calc?

References:

Re: TI-H: Re: IR Link Status (was: expensive remote control)

From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)

Prev: Re: TI-H: Backlight?
Next: TI-H: Co-processor
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread