Re: TI-H: Demolition Calc

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Demolition Calc
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:16:44 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <00ba01be2d19$e4403cc0$0100a8c0@bobtheliz.idworld.net>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>>Why not, it doesn't matter.  If ones priciples are strong enough one
>>>will resist what one considers unethical actions regardless of the
>>>consquences.  Naturally this depends on ones personaly philosophy,
>>>some people are willing to die for what they believe is right, others
>>>are content to allow violations of their own or others rights as long
>>>as it doesn't cost them 'too much'.
>>
>>Thats stupid.  If I went to court and they asked me to open the safe, I
>>would...anb laugh at them when they saw the paper bag...
>
>
>Great, but (IMO) your rights will have been violated anyway.
>
>>The point is most people don't encrypt their school assignments...so he
>>court tends to think anything that is hidden or where there has been an
>>effort to hide something, then its important.
>
>This is of course backwards, we should be able to hide anything we
>want for any reason without coming under suspision.

We can't hide records for tax returns, or else they fine us...

References:

Re: TI-H: Demolition Calc

From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@geocities.com>