Re: TI-H: e(g)

Re: TI-H: e(g)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: e(g)
• From: Kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>
• Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 18:44:57 -0600
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <v04020a01b29e12192543@[24.237.1.152]>
• References: <fc.000f62d1001474cb000f62d1001474cb.1474cd@pinecrest.edu>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

so it doesnt support i2c yet...
hmm
does putting the e(g) code in the e2 avr produce any desirable effects? or
is it just a free e2?


At 04:43 PM 12/16/98 -0900, you wrote:
>
>>what's the current state o fthe e(g)? just wondering.
>
>Its coded and done.  I might still add I2C.
>

• Re: TI-H: e(g)
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• TI-H: e(g)
• From: fuzz@pinecrest.edu (David Norelid)
• Re: TI-H: e(g)
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)
• Next: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread