Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)

Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)
• From: Kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>
• Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 18:17:16 -0600
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <fc.000f62d1001475a9000f62d1001474cb.1475ab@pinecrest.edu>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

that is the only thing i havnet been able to pry out of grant's head.  I
will eventualy examine the code and see what the code requires in the
schematic.  I don't even know if the e(g) code posted supports the dram/ide
support.

I don't know.  I havnt had much luck asking grant these questions.


At 06:16 PM 12/16/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>but what about the plans for the dram and the ide support?
>
>
>FUZZ
>David Norelid
>Posse in effect, yo
>-------------------
>listen.to/yankovic
>ICQ: 3512251
>
>

• Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Re(2): TI-H: e(g)
• From: fuzz@pinecrest.edu (David Norelid)

• Prev: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)
• Next: Re: TI-H: e(g)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread