Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i

Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 19:31:01 -0900
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <36708ED7.8E6DF6F4@geocities.com>
• References: <002a01be231b$1e2b5cc0$3eb2aad0@steve> <3.0.6.32.19981209224109.007a8100@gussie.alaska.net>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>And compatability is almost garunteed.  I mean they wrote the shit.  Who
>would know better?

Mark or the professor who designed the Edsac...

• Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: "Steve Ranck" <psufreak@mindless.com>
• Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Pellaeon <_pellaeon@geocities.com>

• Prev: Re(2): TI-H: Let's dance with the devil [OT and On-T]
• Next: Re: TI-H: Let's dance with the devil [OT and On-T]
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread