Re: TI-H: Re:

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re:
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:14:36 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <912563776.24507.25@excite.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>I am not sure about the AVR, but the PIC has a TON of info, inlcuding
>premade projects (kewl ones I might add) and plans to build the PIC
>burner... I'd probably start out with Z80 (via a TI calc.), then go up to
>PIC/AVR... although I don't know much about the AVR, so shoot me (no flames,
>it is the law of the list! :)...

The AVR costs less an is faster than the PIC.  PIC, CISC.  33MHz -
8.01MIPS.  AVR, RISC.  8MHz - 8MIPS.

Grant

Its a ton easier to just trash the calc.  You can't learn about embedded
programming on an embedded device made for doing math...

References:

Re: TI-H: Re:

From: "Dan" <danb@excite.com>

Prev: Re: TI-H: Re:
Next: Re: TI-H: Ahhh It's good to be back.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread