Re: TI-H: Is this the TI-Hardware list?

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
References:
Grant Stockly wrote: > First, what PIC are you using? That would depend how you program it. It > would be a ton easier to do the CBL code in C and use inline ASM for the > calc interface and the target sensor. You should probably use the 16F84. > Its a nice little chip. Well, I use the PIC that suits the situation. No, I don't agree that it would be 'a ton easier', though it might be. I rather do it in assembly (I know, I'm stubborn. I suppose I really should look into the freeware small-c PIC compiler, but it only supports the 16F84. Anyway...) I'll probably implement it in 84 for testing, and then 'port' it to whichever chip suits my next set of needs. > Which language do you 'do'? Its already kinda been done... I'd recomend > you just set the thing to alaways return a single variable with the data > required and have different code for each set of calcs. That would make > things much easier. ??? Ok, here's what I want. I know where to get the protocol. I am asking if anyone has implemented code that talks to the calculator as a CBL does. If not, I'll do it myself. If so, then I can save a hour or two, since I only have a few of them a week to do this stuff. -Adam
References: