Re: TI-H: Re: Comments on List, and other things...(Please read.)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Re: Comments on List, and other things...(Please read.)
Ok. grant. You are a brilliant young kid, and your ideas are great. i for
one, am interested in a lot of our work, i just dont have time to do much of
it. :)
I wish people woudnt get so damn mad at you all the time, but you shoudlnt
instalnyl get pissed off at them back.
I personally dont mind getting alot of offtopic email. it keeps me up to
date and stuff
also, aobut the super fast ti-85, i would have responded (they both got to
the list) but i am working on something i think will be cooler :)) a z80
based computer that is better then the 85
its propbly dumb, but it willbe fun for me
--Jonathan Kaus
IRC: Jedsmeny
ICQ: 15873088
AIM: Jedsmeny
email: kaus@cybrzn.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, August 22, 1998 11:39 PM
Subject: TI-H: Re: Comments on List, and other things...(Please read.)
>
>> Agreed. To the Die Hard Mac users (read: Grant). Apple is dying. Their
>>market share is quickly dwindling, with the final blow to Apple being
>>3rd party developers are quickly exiting stage left, and running for
>>the doors. No companies are activly developing for the Apple Macs
>>alone. Most 'important' companies (read: Game companies and Office
>>software companies) are no longer considering the Mac as a viable
>>platform for development, and if Mac versions of games are made, they
>>are ported by a development house that strictly ports software. Speed
>>of the processor is irrelevant. I've used this rationalization with
>>several people: The speed of the proc. is virtually invisiable, the true
>>visiable speed of the computer is in the video card.
>
>I can play any PC game at full speed using software emulation so your
>arguement doesn't have ground.
>
>
>> Now, to the subject of this list. With 3494 in my TI-H folder. (first
>>message is dated 4/17/98) I find this mailing list intriguing. It is
>>filled with Mac/PC wars, and seems to have lost sight of its topic. I
>>admit, I've fueled the fire on off topic discussions, but it seems that
>>is what this list is mainly consisted of. Most projects proposed are of
>>either impractibility, or unnecessary. The most fruitful discussion on
>>this list I've seen is the internal memory expansion.
>
>No one is interested in *TI* stuff. I posted some EIII junk a while back.
>No one cared. I posted ATA-2 junk and people got PO'd. I also offered to
>post instructions on an internal EII, and nooo one was interested.
>
>>The portable MP3 player is a great idea, and as I figured,
>>you are using a MPEG decoder chip.
>
>You design the schematic, make the code, debug the code, and then get back
>to me. Oh yeah. You also have to be a looser kid like me in 8th grade.
>
>>There is no great mystery to how a
>>MP3 decoder could be made with a premade chip.
>
>There is only *1* way and most people don't know how. Its a great mystery
>if you have 3 ground and 3 positive supplies to fool with. If you've ever
>looked at the MAS3507D schematic, then you'd know what i'm talking about.
>
>Btw, the mas was the easy part. Try creating a fat system on an 8bit
>microcontroller. And with that, ATA-2 PIO and DMA support. I beleive you
>will think its semi hard. Also, at the same time maintaining a .7MHz or
>higher serial data rate.
>
>
Follow-Ups: