Re: TI-H: Second Link Port

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Second Link Port
From: "Matt Cooper" <mnemonicdevice@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 20:08:40 PDT
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Ah.  I'd heard of MBus and played around with the chat program, but only 
one-on-one.  I might just add a second 2.5mm jack to my calc sometime 
soon.  Or not so soon.  Maybe around XMas.  Cause with my class schedule 
right now, I need that 85 to not be broken so I can cheat with it in 
class!! Oops I don't mean cheat, utilize it to my educational advantage 
I mean.  =)

--Matt

----Original Message Follows----
>From owner-ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Fri 
Aug 14 20:05:34 1998
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Received: by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (VMailer, from userid 
507)
	id 440849419A; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 05:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <008f01bdc7f9$82717660$e08ffacf@jedsmeny>
From: "Kaus" <kaus@cybrzn.com>
To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: Second Link Port
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 22:05:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org


This would work fine.  In fact, if you have a ti-85 and have heard of 
the
mbus network, this is great for that.  yOu can use both at the same 
time.
Jonathan Kaus

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Cooper <mnemonicdevice@hotmail.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Friday, August 14, 1998 10:00 PM
Subject: TI-H: Second Link Port


>
>Alright I realize this is utterly pointless but should I desire, could 
I
>add a second link port in parallel with the first one. perhaps a 3.5mm
>jack?  Would any special components be required (other than the obvious
>jack) or would plain wire be enough?  I know that both link ports would
>obviously not operate at the same time.
>
>--Matt Cooper / mnemonicdevice@hotmail.com
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com





______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com