Re: TI-H: IR Link
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: IR Link
Of course, i don't know if 300 baud is fast enough for plane jump 2...i
might have to reduce it to chatting...either way, it's a pretty cool idea...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Olson <morph@jmss.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: IR Link
>
>Quite frankly? yes. Actually, i want both, ands i'm going to build both.
>Depends on what class i'm in at the time. :> Might be kinda cool to play
PJ2
>during study halls with someone accross the school (assuming of course,
>they're not too much interference.)
>
>
>-- Jon Olson
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 7:40 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: IR Link
>
>
>>
>>Are you guys sure you want a stinky IR link when you can have rf? :)
>>
>>>Okay.. found page in digikey w/ 880 nm and 950-960 nm. That's about the
>>>largest frequency spread they have (near infrared; far infrared stuff is
>>>harder to find)Transistor type or photoresistor sensor?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ohh... I keep forgetting to do that... the ti-hardware window popps up
>>>>right after my electronics group, so I forget that its actually hard to
>>>>whip up something like this... ;)
>>>>
>>>>First find 2 leds that operate at different freqs.. Then find to
>receivers
>>>>that operate at different freqs.. Good. Now get 2 of each of those...
>:)
>>>>
>>>>I'll make schematics as soon as my IBM decides to work...
>>>>
>>>>Btw, if everyone says apple is at the bottom, and PC at the top...if
your
>>>>at the top, you have no where to go but down... :P
>>>>
>>>>>Grant, did you ever finish that Discrete IR link, and if so, could you
>>>>>please release the schematics? Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>- Jon Olson
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>"Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!" -- Bill Gates, 1981
>>>>>"Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM." -- Bill Gates, 1996
>>>>>"Nobody will ever need Windows 95." -- logical conclusion
>>>>
>>>>
>>