Re: TI-H: MD?

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: MD?
From: "SMC12" <scross@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 14:42:57 -0700
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


And for an 82/85, you would have to have xShell, whitch eats about 1k more.
If you made your programs specially in segments of 1-5k each (graphics,
etc.) you would be able to pull it of in segments.

>Unfortunately, the 82/83's or lower have very little memory, and 16k
>would make quite a dent. If an MD interface was constructed, one of its
>possible advantages would be that it would allow:
> -More storage space for data (duh)
> -The ability to create larger programs
> ^If the data was buffered in the internal memory, this would not be
>possible. The application would have to be executed directly from the
>MD.
> Also realize that you've already lost 16k to the driver, giving you
>approximately 12k free (assuming you don't have other programs stored
>on the memory.
>
>-Gabe
>

Prev: Re: TI-H: EL Backlight installed!
Next: Re: TI-H: EL Backlight installed!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread