Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...

Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...
• From: Chris Cooper <cooper@fort-frances.LakeheadU.Ca>
• Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 22:39:04 -0600
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <35b84854.3526b233@aol.com>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

I would have to agree, this is kind of overkill for most people maybe 2or3 of the
10+ people I know (at school) that want more memory, wouldn't even know how to
say the features of the SuperI/O III, let alone know what they are... what ever
happened to the *simple* EII?

Exxon00 wrote:

> I would definently be interested in such a device, but it seems like there is
> so much stuff I wouldn't use.

• Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...
• From: Richard Piotter <richfile@prairie.lakes.com>
• Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...
• From: Richard Piotter <richfile@prairie.lakes.com>

• Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...
• From: Exxon00 <Exxon00@aol.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: Okay guys...
• Next: Re: TI-H: Super I/O III (EIII): As I Said...
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread