Re: TI-H: New TI
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: New TI
Matthew Andersen wrote:
>
> I remember hearing good things about the RISC chips... but, not to play
> on the name, arn't they still a little unstable or not all perfect...
> correct me if i'm wrong (and with my day its likly). Also RISC just
> doesn't sound like a good chip to put into something that you are
> selling to the public... NOT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS.... hehe
TI has never before stated that a processor was CISC based on the
box...maybe in the website documentation, but most people smart enough
to find that know what it means. :)
So why would they even advertise that it was RISC? Just advertising
something beyond the traditional 6Mhz would be great!
--
Jake Robb Email:jake@netrus.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
< "Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice >
< doggy' until you can find a rock." >
< -Unknown >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
References: