Re: TI-H: Re: Ir Link compatability
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Re: Ir Link compatability
Osma Suominen wrote:
>
> Matthew H. Fogle wrote:
>
> > Ah; I see; thanks for clearing that up to me. Hmm; maybe he missed a
> > UART chip then in his idea. I agree with you then; how can it work as he
> > said it does? With a special driver it could; and less hardware as well.
> > Hmm; maybe the TI-92's transfer slightly differently? Maybe he only
> > tested it with a send or recieve and not normal TI protocol?
>
> Nope, the TI-92 uses the exact same protocol as the 8x series. At least on
> the hardware level it's the same, the packets are slightly different. So
> our only options are that Greg didn't test it with the TI protocol or that
> he's lying to us. Or then again, I might be wrong, but as you seem to share
> my views, I'm getting more and more confident.
>
> I'd like to hear from the version with the correct schematic and correct
> RS232 pinouts, but I still don't think it will work.
>
> -Ozone
>
> --
> *** Osma Suominen *** ozone@clinet.fi *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone ***
Would the link work if the data was already converted to RS-232? If so
we could use a graphlink with it instead. It would cost more but if you
really wanted ir communication. And if it did need a Graphlink or it
does somehow convert the TTL to RS-232 then we could create a ir port
for the computer. We could transfer files to the calcs from a
distance. Why we would want to do this I'll leave up to someone else
:).
Adam Kavan
akavan@cse.unl.edu
Rember to help support the ban on Dihydrogen Monoxide at
http://www.netreach.net/~rjones/no_dhmo.html .
Please note this is not my webpag but it is something I feel strongly
about!
Follow-Ups:
References: