Re: TI-H: List Conversion/Comms <-> Casio Calcs
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: List Conversion/Comms <-> Casio Calcs
On 15-Oct-97, Osma Suominen wrote:
>Nicholas Piper wrote:
>> I think its similar to the Ti protocol, only different, IYSWIM ;-)
>Whoa, that helped a lot ;)
>The main question is: Can the TI link port hardware be used with the Casio
>protocol?
I thought it would :-) What I mean't, was, yes, I think it should... as it
works
the same "way" as the Ti protocols, just with different Bits. As it, eg.
it Sends ASCII 6, and waits for a reply. Etc :-)
>> The .cas format is simple, similar again in design to the Ti format.. just
>> uses different headers and stuff :-)
>Well, then the converting should be reltively easy...but still, there are
>many other obstacles...
I think I'll subscribe to the asm83 list now ;-)
>> The whole idea, or just the adding extra power IREDS ?
>The whole idea, because dozens of IR link designs have been tried by me and
>many others, and none of them has worked well, mainly because the link
>cable has two data lines which are both bidirectional. It's technically
>quite difficult to send such data over an IR link.
Erk. You are saying that *both* the lines are Bi-directional ? There isn't
a Tx and a Rx ?!? Hum. This is interesting....
Well, I can at least use these IR modules for an IR link of the Casio
units at school....
--
Nich.
Piper Communications - http://pcomm.home.ml.org/
······························· P · G · P ····································
[2048 Bits] 50E4FC39 Nicholas C. Piper <pcomm@inorbit.com> [High Security Key]
Key fingerprint = 41 3C 25 76 BF 07 CB 43 97 65 26 67 81 78 C9 A9
[768 Bits] 66041181 Nicholas C. Piper <pcomm@inorbit.com>
Key fingerprint = 4A 15 8F E5 61 58 39 BE 5D 02 FD 44 A9 13 5D C0
Follow-Ups:
References: