Re: TI-H: AM link
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: AM link
Matthew H. Fogle wrote:
>
> greg wrote:
>
> > Matthew H. Fogle wrote:
> > >
> > > I take it this is not compatible with the normal link as you
> > couldn't
> > > have tested it with that and had it work one way...
> >
> > I don't understand what your getting at.
>
> I'm just asking if it's compatible with the normal link; the design
> I'm making and have now found all but one of the chips I need is. I'm
> wondering if you will tell me some of what you did and I can tell you
> what I'm planning... You have the easy part done now; I'd like to know
> when you try the bi-directional transfer and how you get the reciever to
> not go berzerk with the transmitter by it. I'm planning on a design with
> flip-flops; and not gates to turn off Rx for the moment while I Tx the
> data. The flip-flops will keep the calc thinking Rx is there though.
> What are your ideas?
>
> -=<Matt>=
Oh, one other note... I have an idea that would use ultrasonic sound
waves. Like TV remotes on earlier models. This sounds reasonable but it
would have to work in direct line-of-sight. It also wouldn't work at
that great of a distance either.
References: