RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way

RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• From: "Joseph C. Bender" <aa807@detroit.freenet.org>
• Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 11:03:06 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <01BCD2EB.5733EEA0.zumwalt@alaska.net>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

At 05:59 AM 10/7/97 -0800, you wrote:
>AM would be another good consideration because the low frequency 
>makes part counts and parts very easy to work with.
>
	Actually, AM can be run at ANY frequency, as well as SSB.  Just because
the AM broadcast band is so low, doesn't mean that we have to be.

	49 MHz anyone?
Regards, 

J. Bender

Joseph C. Bender, 	N8XRE          |  AX.25:  N8XRE@WB8SWF.#SEMI.MI.USA.NA
mailto:  aa807@detroit.freenet.org |  PGP MAIL ENABLED/PREFERRED
ICQ UIN:  398486                          |  Key at keyserv or
mailto:jcbpgp@mutiny.net
Personal Page:  <http://www.mutiny.net/personal/jcbender> 
antispam:  admin@localhost 	postmaster@localhost    root@[127.0.0.1]
{Jesus saves!  But Yzerman SCOOOORES on the rebound!}

• Re: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• From: "Matthew H. Fogle" <cs239ac@chicoma.la.unm.edu>

• RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• From: Jan Zumwalt <zumwalt@alaska.net>

• Prev: RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• Next: TI-H: RF IDEA!(To work!) and some FAQ info (seperate)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread