Re: TI-H: Okay I maybe overreacted
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Okay I maybe overreacted
Osma Suominen wrote: There's not much point in a RF or IR link that
needs its own driver to work.
You see the problem though is to make a RF-link capable of working as
the normal link we must have two channels of radio that can both we
turned to TX and RX on the fly. This itself would need a driver I think
since we only have two data lines and the only way to change the RX TX
would be to control it via a line (I think). I suppose we could make a
tranciever that would auto switch like VOX or something. Maybe I should
look into that but I think that will cost far more to make and it might
already be on the expensive side for a pair. I'm working with one line
transmit and one line recieve now as this way we only need one
transmitter and one reciever each tuned to a different freq per calc. I
agree it would be good to be compatible with the normal link but that's
just very complex as far as I see it. The main problem with any RF-link
is the feedback we get for having a transmitter right next to a reciever
while both are working. We need to eliminate almost ALL noise emissions
to get it to work without errors.
-=<Matt>=-
Follow-Ups:
References: