Re: TI-H: Picsell!

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Picsell!
From: pea@dalnet.se
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:17:44 +0100 (MET)
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

At 07:19 1997-11-21 PST, you wrote:

What do you think? I for an example have translate the TI85 protocol to my
ir protocol which using this the ir transfer is much faster. With a
processor you can do more with less components. And if you use a programable
non processorcomponent you also get less components! But why bother it's
cheap with common components? But I don't use it for this purpose!   

>ok , as long as it works.
>what is your opinion on ir links that use programable components versus 
>the ones people are trying to make with "common components"
>i mean to say, what are the advantages of your link.
>????
>
>

Prev: Re: TI-H: Electronics Tutorials
Next: Re: TI-H: Complaining about memory...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread