Re: TI-H: IR-Link
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: IR-Link
we do its just that i personaly dont know anything about PIC proseccors
, unless you are going to sell them???????
>From listown@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Thu Nov 20 11:49:07 1997
>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by
towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA11134 for
ti-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 20:39:52 +0100
>From: pea@dalnet.se
>Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 20:36:12 +0100 (MET)
>Message-Id: <199711201936.UAA20621@flash.dalnet.se>
>X-Sender: pea@dalnet.se
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: TI-H: IR-Link
>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>
>At 20:46 1997-11-19 +0000, you wrote:
>If you not want programmable components you should wait a little while
for
>my friend Magnus Svedins construction. He is building a ir-link with a
few
>common components. And that is cool!
>We have two options here: With a onchip processor or with "common
>components". Why not both?
>I am really tired of explaining all this things around the link and its
>functions! If you go on like this no one want's to build a good
ir-link. I
>only make it for fun! It's going to be a really good link (It's working
but
>I will not release the code yet! It must become better first!). But it
seems
>like no one wants a good ir-link! Or?
>
>Per-Erik Andersson
>pea@dalnet.se
>page at: http://www.dalnet.se/~pea/pic.htm
>
>>
>>The way I see it, if you make an IR link, at least make it so that it
>>is cheap and easy to build for almost anyone. The design I have
>>thought of but not tested as of yet uses only common parts, no
>>programmable components.
>>
>>Ed Plese
>>www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/bay/2267
>>
>>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com