TI-H: Re: Reform
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
TI-H: Re: Reform
I write long, so if you want the big idea for this post, read my last
paragraph first. Then read the beginning if you like.
_______________________________________________________________
I always got a kick thinking about crazy ideas and cool addons. I didn't
care how stupid or simple they may have been, nor have I ever cared
about how dificult a project would be.
If would have listened to the complaints and teases, the SPinTerface
port would surely not exist. I realize that it is simple and redundant,
but it still makes so much more possible. It is a standardized way to
connect to the link port and power supply simultaneously. Some people
said it would be better to make it 8-pin, and even though it would have
been better, people had been building them as 10-pin ports for quite
some time. Making them otherwise would have been defeating it's purpose.
I have seen countless IR links and claims of IR links, half of which
probably barely bork or only transmit one way or something like that. I
don't care. They are cool, not because they don't work perfectly, but
because the people had an idea and tried.
Some people don't have the resources to create projects on their own.
Others, like me, don't have a clue as to how to make a driver cause we
don't know ASM. Others don't have the time. Some aren't good with the
soldering iron, but are great with the assembly.
How about we work together on projects rather than say how difficult it
would be. I would rather try and fail than never try it. I have designed
so many devices, but I couldn't find anyone to make drivers, so I
ditched them. My only devices being made are the backlight, SPinTerface
port, and the battery expander, and AC adaptor. I build temp sensors,
Sound cartridges, ESF and EuPs, and a few other things, but those are
the devices that have been created. There have been almost NO NEW
DEVICES LATELY! We are debating on things totaly unrelated. I brought up
interfacing to the ADB port and people jump in on the "Will MacOS run on
Intel???" That is definitely not TI related.
I think we need to be more open with the stuff too. we worry about
people coping our source code for a microcontroller. Then we complain
about not having enough time to make the things. I think microcontroller
source files should be posted to ticalc.org so people with the equipment
could make their own chips. I realize that there were inceedents that
were problematic to our trust, but we need to SHARE ideas or they won't
develope. We would need to keep the source standardized, soo if there is
some read protection option on the files, then it could be possible to
send them safe. People who want to develope the code could ask
permission from the original coder. This would mean any one could make
the equipment themselves. All drivers should have puplicly posted
source. How can you expect development if you won't do it yourselves and
you won't give it out, don't complain. We are so worried about others
coping stuff. IF ANYONE COPIES, thier code would be seen and it would be
obvious that it was copied. Action could then be taken.
We are also so worried about how little time we have, that we say
something is impossible or infeasible if it doesn't fit our time slot.
Maybe there are people willing to give up time over a long period to
make something possible. Maybe we could ask if anyone is interested and
then form development teams, taking comments and suggestions from the
others as well. Try stuff. If it doesn't work, then you know. You don't
need to speculate anymore. I once wrote an update for a Mortal Kombat
clone for TI-82 BASIC. It was fast, had cool graphics (cool for basic,
but then again, I've seen ASM with cheaper graphics), and had lots of
features. I soon added other features such as saving your game and full
screen animated finishing moves. It was awesome, but it got slower each
time I added something. I realized that if I finnished the link mode, It
would be unbearable. You'd NEED a turbo upgrade for it! I looked at the
program for stuff I could take out, but everything was important, but
then I realized that the software was designed for the ORIGINAL short
loop. It was never designed for that much data. I reallized then that I
could shorten the loop and make multiple ones, that individualy would
run faster. I never did it because I realy got into the hardware stuff,
but I was glad to know I could do it.
Everyone was saying how slow a mouse would be, but has it been DONE yet.
Everyone says how hard an IR link would be. It has been done before on
profesional devices, and circuits probably exist, but we don't KNOW
about them. We need to try stuff, not cry about how tough it is to do it
or say there's no way to do it quickly. The Apple Lisa was a mere 5 MHz.
That is slower than a calc. It had a mouse, a 720x300 something screen,
1 or 2 disk drives, and a GUI, and it ran. It was slow, but what do you
expect. People are asking for a simple mouse or trackpad that has 3
pieces of data. x,y, and button. If you're that worried about space and
you don't think a trackpad uses low enough power, you could connect a
cheap TRS-80 joystick to an Analog to Digital converter that uses I2C or
something. You could use a PIC (oh forget PIC cause they suck, use the
AWESOME AVR instead!).
Here is what we NEED to do. DON'T send a response if it won't help
development of a device. THAT MEANS NO flames, insults, claims that it's
impossible, or claims it isn't worth the time. No more debates over
unrelated topics, no more OS's, no more debates on the future of Macs
and PCs. No more complaints about hotmail screwing up, cause sometimes
it does, sometimes you forget something and quick click stop and you're
too late. No more complaints about how that signature takes a whole 400
bytes or how it takes 4 more seconds to load the old text from previous
messages. Lets keep it to Hardware for TI calcs, and hardware that
allows TI calcs to connect to other devices. If you have a comment on a
signature, a complaint on something else, TAKE IT TO PRIVATE E-MAIL. If
you do respond, do you realy want to know you're thestart of another
non-TI debate or a flame war??? Come on people! lets do this right. I
have said before. THIS IS A HOBBY! I like doing this stuff, but I can't
do everything. Chris was right we need reform! We have forgotten about
our hobby and run off the topic.
Richard Piotter
E-Mail:
richfiles1@hotmail.com
richfiles@usa.net
The Richfiles:
<A
HREF="http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/5081/Richfiles.html">The
Richfiles TI Page</A>
<A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/8510/Richfiles.html">The
Richfiles Model Building Page</A>
>This will probably be one of my last posts on this list. I have seen a
serious degradation in the attitude of this hobby.
> When I signed onto the list, I expected it to be a place where people
would share ideas and work together in order to enhance the
TI-calculators in general, with the "veterans" aiding the less
experienced. I had originally been proven correct.
> However, I saw things go to crap pretty quickly.
>I will regret having left this community, but the lack of cohesion has
gone too far.
>Christopher Kalos
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Follow-Ups: