Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF

Subject: Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF
From: Steve Wrobleski <s_wrobleski@foma.wsc.mass.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 21:26:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF>

ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org wrote:
> 
> Robin, Jim, &amp; Eric Barker wrote:
> 
> >   1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the
> > RF link.
> 
> But it's legal (which IS important in some countries!) and probably
> easier to build. It would probably be best to try to design both.
> 
> -Ozone
> 
> --
> *** Osma Suominen *** <a href="mailto:ozone@clinet.fi">ozone@clinet.fi</a> *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone
> ***
> 
>
> Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@defiant.rbk.sollentuna.se

Yeah. kinda like the fbi comes knocking on your door if a teacher
displays a video in class, or you get barracaded in your house and shot
up brutally if you try to leave if you remove your tags on your mattress
or chair. heh

--Steve

References:

From:

Prev: Re: TI-H: RCL - Radio Chat Link
Next: Re: TI-H: ti-turbo
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread