Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
>Ok here are some things we should stick to with the RF (whatever that
>stands for) link, here is what we need to concentrate on):
>
> 1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the
>RF link.
> 2. A two calc radio connection (not 3 or more)
> 3. The user should be able to change the frequency, no making 2
>different links, that's a waste.
[SNIP]
Right-- multifrequency. But let's not use potentiometers, but 20
position rotary switches or something like that... That way no need to
fine-fune. (like CB, not radio-- channels instead of frequencies.)
References: