Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF

Okay. This was my idea. DON'T GO TAKING CONTROL OF IT. I know an
infrequently used IRC server we could log on to. The problem with that is
that everyone needs to read everything. You can't get that with IRC.


Basically, Eric, DON'T take control of my idea. I presented it to the list.
I'm trying to put it all together. DON'T knock other's idea's. It may be
brilliant. DON'T talk if you're uninformed. You've asked a lot of diddly
questions. You fill up the list with your comments. IR is important to. RF
may not work. So DON'Ttry and kill another idea.


DON'T TRY TO TAKE CREDIT AND/OR CONTROL OF THE RF LINK. WHEN YOU WRITE MAIL
LIKE THIS, IT SEEMS TO ME LIKE THAT'S JUST WHAT YOU'RE DOING.


     /--------------------------------\
    /         Travis Pettijohn         \
   /    primary:  travisp@inil.com      \
  /   alternate:  travisp@juno.com       \
 /   http://www.inil.com/users/travisp/   \
/------------------------------------------\
I assume no liability for any advice I give.


> From: Robin, Jim, &amp; Eric Barker <rbarker@polarnet.com>
> To: TI-Hardware <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
> Subject: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF
> Date: Monday, November 04, 1996 11:49 PM
> 
> Ok here are some things we should stick to with the RF (whatever that 
> stands for) link, here is what we need to concentrate on):
> 
>   1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the 
> RF link.
>   2. A two calc radio connection (not 3 or more)
>   3. The user should be able to change the frequency, no making 2 
> different links, that's a waste.
>   4. The link needs to be able to go over long distences.  More than 50 
> feet away if possible.
>   5. We need to use a high frequency band for interference and clarity 
> reasons.
> 
> For an issue link this, e-mail is rediculus.  We need a full IRC telnet, 
> (MUD) type chat area to disscuss the RF link.  It would be nice if there 
> were more chat area's link this.  If Mangus is listening, please, this 
> would be very nice and we could get things done much faster.
> 
> Eric Barker
References: