Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Osma Suominen wrote:
>
> Robin, Jim, & Eric Barker wrote:
> > 1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the
> > RF link.
>
> But it's legal (which IS important in some countries!) and probably
> easier to build. It would probably be best to try to design both.
Come on, we can make a legal RF link. It just can't go that far, maybe
50 meters. That's all we need. How do you think remote control car
companies do it?
Eric Barker
References: