Re: TI-H: RF Link Idea....
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
PUT IT ON THE LIST PLEASE.
At 11:11 PM 11/2/96 +0000, you wrote:
>PLEASE!! MIME attatch it to my address, not the list, unless people say PUT
>IT ON THE LIST!
>
>travisp@inil.com
>
>And if you can't scan it, please draw it. And a Radio Shack parts list
>would be great, if you have one!
>
> /--------------------------------\
> / Travis Pettijohn \
> / primary: travisp@inil.com \
> / alternate: travisp@juno.com \
> / http://www.inil.com/users/travisp/ \
>/------------------------------------------\
>
>----------
>> From: C.J. Oster <cjo@pobox.com>
>> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>> Subject: Re: TI-H: RF Link Idea....
>> Date: Saturday, November 02, 1996 4:08 PM
>>
>> >>it probably wont work, cause i head that the transfer is asyncronous
>(sp?),
>> >>and walkie talkies can only transmit one side at a time... but the do
>have
>> >>asyncronous walkie-talkies on sale at radio shack this week... and how
>are
>> >>you going to get the buttons to depress at the correct times?
>>
>> The reason that walkie talkies are not asynchronous is because the send
>and
>> recieve frequencies are the same. To eliminate feedback, you can't
>recieve
>> while transmitting, and vice-versa. I have a schematic for a very
>> efficient radio transmitter that works. All you have to do is make a
>> reciever, which consists of a coil and a diode (and an amplifier if you
>> want it to transmitt a long distance). Then you would set the recieve
>> frequencie of one calc to the send freq of the other calc. If you want
>it,
>> I'll try to get it scanned and sent it to you.
>>
>> -C.J.-
>>
>>
>>
>> ********************************************************************
>> Unsolicited commercial e-mail to the poster of this message
>> will be proofread at $70/hr, minimum charge $150. Submission
>> of such e-mail to this address will suffice as contractual assent
>> to the said charging schedule.
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>
References: