Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor
From: "John Riney" <jriney@dycon.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:59:09 -0500
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Careful now, this is getting close to a flame.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Sent from the home box of 
John Riney
jriney@dycon.com
Abort, Retry, Sledgehammer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

----------
> From: Ryan <pogge@shore.intercom.net>
> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor
> Date: Tuesday, December 10, 1996 3:00 PM
> 
> 
> At 09:28 PM 12/9/96 EST, you wrote:
> >
> >>I have been wondering for months where to find a smaller cap, and I
> >>recently realised that something that small may actually overclock the
> >>TI-85.  If you wan those speeds, just take out c9 and leave it empty.
> >
> >If one was to do this, then the wave being sent to the Z80 would be
> >totally flat, and would have no pulse in order to regulate it's internal
> >clock.  Therefore, the Z80 would freeze, and possibly be ruined.
> >
> >Neat idea, tho.  =)
> >
> >	- J. Bishop
> >
> >
> Actualy it works fine..............mr. electronics expert.
> make sure you know what you are talking about befor you tell someone they
> are wrong,
> cause you are wrong.
> it does not freez and is not ruined.
> takeing out the c9 works great.
> ><))));>