Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor

To: John M Bishop <castomel@juno.com>
Subject: Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor
From: Bharath Pola <pola@cns.uni.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:34:13 -0600 (CST)
Cc: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <19961209.212205.14310.2.castomel@juno.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, John M Bishop wrote:

> 
> >I have been wondering for months where to find a smaller cap, and I
> >recently realised that something that small may actually overclock the
> >TI-85.  If you wan those speeds, just take out c9 and leave it empty.
> 
> If one was to do this, then the wave being sent to the Z80 would be
> totally flat, and would have no pulse in order to regulate it's internal
> clock.  Therefore, the Z80 would freeze, and possibly be ruined.
> 
> Neat idea, tho.  =)
> 
> 	- J. Bishop
> 

That's what I did and it worked just fine.  It might just depend on the
TI...some people have problems when they don't put at least a low
capacitance cap in and others (me included) have absolutely no problems.
I'm not sure where you're getting this flat wave thing...care to explain?

	-Bart
	 Pola@cns.uni.edu
	 College of Natural Sciences
	 University of Northern Iowa

References:

Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor

From: castomel@juno.com (John M Bishop)