RE: TIB: Resetting memory

To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: TIB: Resetting memory
From: "Matthew" <mobets@flash.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 22:17:18 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <f5.18b05c.25afadbb@aol.com>
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


The 92(+) also has the geometry app that the 89 does not have

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of EMPrime@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:38 PM
To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TIB: Resetting memory



No. They're exactly the same in terms of performance and programming
capability. The only difference is case design, but soon I'll have them
both!
I'm gonna get an 89 to go with my 92+ for backup and test-taking purposes.

> is the 89 actually better than the 92/92+, or not really? (disregarding
cost,
>
>  since that isnt really an issue)
>


<A HREF="http://prym.8m.com/">Prym.8m.Com!</A> Check out my site!
Matthew Glory, CEO Right Side Minds Battlefield Technology
                Former Mercenary
ICQ:            55807773
TI-Calc ActiveList: 58286255

Follow-Ups:

Re: TIB: Resetting memory

From: Adam Newhouse <cheetah@cheetahsden.com>

RE: TIB: Resetting memory

From: Rob Smith <kormoc@netzero.net>

References:

Re: TIB: Resetting memory

From: EMPrime@aol.com

Prev: TIB: Virtual Bitch 83 and R.I.G. for 83 and 86
Next: Re: TIB: Resetting memory
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread