Re: TIB: Re: Re: TI-Basic Digest V1 #606

Re: TIB: Re: Re: TI-Basic Digest V1 #606

• To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TIB: Re: Re: TI-Basic Digest V1 #606
• From: Paul Kafasis <punkrock17@home.net>
• Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 20:38:26 -0500
• References: <19991109230009.BE805A4150@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se> <3828C28D.D5E21C9E@home.net> <00a301bf2b19$7ccdc4a0$0e7efea9@kormoc>
• Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org

That doesn't appear to be the problem. But I've been told the TI uses
(0,0) to substitute for imaginary numbers, so that might be it...but I
can't see in my code where I've created 64 imaginary numbers, so i
dunno...any other thoughts?

• Re: TIB: Re: Re: TI-Basic Digest V1 #606
• From: "Rob Smith" <kormoc@netzero.net>

• From:
• TIB: Re: TI-Basic Digest V1 #606
• From: Paul Kafasis <punkrock17@home.net>
• TIB: Re: Re: TI-Basic Digest V1 #606
• From: "Rob Smith" <kormoc@netzero.net>

• Prev: TIB: Re: Re: ti-89 basic manual
• Next: TIB: Re: Re: Re: ti-89 basic manual
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread