Re: TIB: Random Number Generation Different From The One Before

To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TIB: Random Number Generation Different From The One Before
From: "Keith Batten" <kbatten@usa.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:15:43 +0100
Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
In-reply-to: <027e01be611e$ed12d4a0$3b2e8ed1@unreality>
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


 ipart takes the ineger part of the number, int takes the closest 
integer, imag is what gives you the imaginary part.
later
Keith
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >:seq(A,A,1,24\->\L ; initial list
> >:for(A,1,50) ; number of times to shuffle
> >:ipart (24rand)+1\->\B
> >:ipart (24rand)+1\->\C
> 
> When will anyone realize that it's not ipart, but int that gets the integer
> part of a number.
> ipart gets the IMAGINARY part. I don't think rand makes imaginary numbers.
> I've had to correct a few basic games that made this same mistake.
> 
> --Chris
> 
>

References:

From: