Re: TIB: Will TI ever introduce a C based Calculator?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TIB: Will TI ever introduce a C based Calculator?
Wrong! Sorry, you don't get the vacation, kitchen set, or even a cigar. You
do, however, get a correction:
ETTamme1@aol.com wrote:
> Umm... well, i think that making a C bsed caculator would make the code
> run A LOT faster and it would make for much easier higher graphics gaming and
> stuff like that.
C based calculator???
> But, i am learning C++ right now and i think it is a much
> more difficult language to master than Ti Basic. Not to metion the money
> involved in this, C is designed to run on the computer not on the calculator!
Wrong. Completely. C was designed to run on a microprocessor. Guess what is
in our calculator? Guess what TI coded a significant portion of their
calculators in? C. Yup.
> C involves A lot more memory too.
A lot more memory than what? Basic? Not. C uses significantly less memory
than basic. C uses the same amount of memory as an asm program would need,
assuming memory was a problem and you coded your c program to use less memory.
> In short, i think it would be virtually
> impossible to make a C based caculator withou doing one of the following.
I'm still not sure what you mean by C based calculator. The z80 and 68k
processors are both _great_ platforms to run C. Did you know that the 68k was
the first processor the MAC used? Gues what the programs were programmed in
then? C!
> 1. Make a palmtop computer that has Ti calc functions.
> 2. Make a kind of PC emulator to run on the Calcs then run the current C
> software
> 3. Make a HIGHLY modified version of C that is designed to run with the
> calcs
> hardware
> all of the above are high cost options, but i think if one of these is done
> you could have your C and your calculator too.
> so anyway, theres my thoughts on the subject.
> ~ Eric
Besides, there exists c compilers for both types of calc now. They're a little
rough, not having all the library functions that are included in standard C
packages, but they're getting there.
-Adam
References: