Re: TIB: Command & Conquer 86

Re: TIB: Command & Conquer 86

• To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TIB: Command & Conquer 86
• From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
• Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 17:03:07 -0400
• Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• References: <ac7d5497.354fface@aol.com>
• Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org

TGaArdvark wrote:

> >> This list is very slow!
> >
> > What are you talking about, slow?
> > Compared to what? Why?
>
> I received over 100 letters from ticalc.org lists today.
> 6 of them were from TIB. When compared with the
> other ticalc.org programming lists, this one is pretty
> slow. Also, compared with what it used to be, this
> list is pretty slow. It's also very small.

Yup.  Only filenews-binaries and shell-developers are smaller than
ti-basic.  TI-hardware and Assembly-86 are the most active lists.  Check
out http://www.ticalc.org/auto/liststat/index.html for stats on all the
mailing lists.

Bryan

• Re: TIB: Command & Conquer 86
• From: TGaArdvark <TGaArdvark@aol.com>

• Prev: TIB: Advanced Placement Calculus AB test
• Next: Re: TIB: Command & Conquer 86
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread