Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These

To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These
From: TGaArdvark@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 03:33:26 EDT
Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 6/2/98 10:12:25 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
gussie@alaska.net writes:

>Grant Stockly wrote:
 >>
 >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
 >> >
 >> >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
 >> >> >
 >> >> >> >Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
 >> >> >> >
 >> >> >> >> At 07:13 PM 6/2/98 EDT, you wrote:
 >> >> >> >> >
 >> >> >> >> >> um, how did this go from a BASIC list to a discution of
physics??
 >> >> >> >> >> (not that I mind, I'm just wondering)
 >> >> >> >> >
 >> >> >> >> >BASIC?!  What a stupid topic for a mailing list...
 >> >> >> >>
 >> >> >> >> Easy....
 >> >> >> >> Scorched Earth for TI-BASIC -> Algorithms for trajectory and
 >>height ->
 >> >> >> >> Flames for incorrect algorithms -> Reverse flames that prove
 >>they are
 >> >> >>right
 >> >> >> >> from Physics class -> Message asking how a BASIC discussion went
to
 >> >> >>Physics
 >> >> >> >> -> My reply -> Someone flaming me for following the incorrect
 >> >>pathway that
 >> >> >> >> brought us here this far and giving another pathway -> Someone
else
 >> >> >>flaming
 >> >> >> >> the person who flamed me and saying that we're both wrong and
 >> >>fixing the
 >> >> >> >> incorrect mistakes of both people to what they remember being
 >> >>discussed ->
 >> >> >> >> ......
 >> >> >> >>
 >> >> >> >> You get the picture :)
 >> >> >> >>
 >> >> >> >>                  Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
 >> >> >> >> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow
 >>programmers"
 >> >> >> >>          http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
 >> >> >> >>                     http://shinelight.home.ml.org
 >> >> >> >
 >> >> >> >  Well, so much for trying to make a joke, and NO ONE HAS ANY
 >> >>OPINION ON MY
 >> >> >> >PROGING SOUND IN BASIC (86)!!!
 >> >> >>
 >> >> >> No sound in basic...
 >> >> >
 >> >> >  are you so sure? I am working on a MIDI type prog now (ok, ok, your
 >> >> >right, I use
 >> >> >a little ASM for actually playing a sound, but the rest is basic)
 >> >>
 >> >> You aren't doing it in basic then...
 >> >
 >> >  What I ment was that I figured out how to use a little asm for a basic
 >> >prog, I had
 >> >to devlope a new adapter to get it to work, and the finnished resilt will
 >> >be very
 >> >cool.  Man, I am trying to expand the capabilitys of the language and all
 >> >I get is
 >> >flames.
 >>
 >> I'not flaming you...  I'm just too much of a hardware guy to let simple
 >> things such as MIDI go to things which would be more like 'Beep Table'.
:)
 >>
 >> If a MIDI adaptor were made, that'd be cool...  I'd like to hook my Yahama
 >> wave table box to my calc but it wouldn't be practical...  :(
 >
 >  Hey, no prob, I know I have a hot temper.  But I use a lot of terms
 >lightly, and
 >I did make a adapter for listing to sound on a calc, without having to go
 >into a
 >shell (like Zshell, on the 85 you would have to use ZBasic or something
 >like it).
> >You know what I'm talking about if you have fooled much with PlayWav.
> >It's really
> >simple, and I might have it done in a week or so.
> 
> PlayWav??  Oh yeah...  I ported it to the 83...
> 
> Only one problem...  Its not good...  Make a driver for a DAC then you've
> got something...  :)

I know!!  LETS SEE HOW MANY TIMES WE CAN QUOTE THE SAME
LETTER WITHOUT REMOVING THE UNIMPORTANT PARTS
THAT WE HAVE ALL SKIPPED OVER SO MANY TIMES THAT WE
HAVE THEM MEMORIZED!!!