Re: TIB: wieghted dice

Re: TIB: wieghted dice

• To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TIB: wieghted dice
• From: Rene Kragh Pedersen <u971168@daimi.aau.dk>
• Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 23:44:00 +0100
• Organization: \
• References: <34CC90E9.3B6E@alaska.net>
• Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org

Jody wrote:
> 
> >
> > You'll need ~1500 rolls before it is statistically significant [1]
> >
> How is it possible that higher numbers have a greater probability than
> lower ones - even if it is small? If you have perfectly even dice,
> isn't it even chance of any number?

You're asking the wrong guy, I just asked that very same question. I
play a lot with dice probabilities, and I'd hate to see that my reality
has changed ;-)

-- 
          Rene Kragh Pedersen
------------------------------------------------------------------
man: Why did you get a divorce?
man:: Too many arguments.

• Re: TIB: wieghted dice
• From: Arno.Kizina@t-online.de (Arno Kizina)

• TIB: wieghted dice
• From: Jody <jody1@alaska.net>

• Prev: TIB: wieghted dice
• Next: Re: TIB: "Weighting" Dice on TI-85
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread