Re: SD: Re: Linux 68k?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SD: Re: Linux 68k?
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/m68k/release-notes/
http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/
You must have seen someone's priviate-not-up-to-date page...
Grant
>well grant, the page that i saw says its not up yet. hmm.
>
>> The linux-m68k kernel IS booting. The www page you download it from is
>> running linux-m68k on a Centris 650!
>>
>> I run the entire OS! It supports 11 or so Macs!
>>
>>
>>> yes, the linux-m68k kernel is close to booting. you must be talking about
>>> something else. I know BSD is more popular. I use it too.
>>>
>>> --
>>> M M IIIII TTTTT CCC H H OOO
>>> MM MM I T C C H H O O
>>> M M M I T C HHHHH O O
>>> M M I T C C H H O O
>>> M M IIIII T CCC H H OOO
>>>
>>> "Microsoft; It's time to call that lame, hack of a company what it is: a
>>> lame, hack of a company." - Prison Guy (Rob), Editor, MacAddict
>>>
>>> on 01/08/2000 09:20 PM, Grant Stockly at gussie@stockly.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Close to booting!&?!
>>>>
>>>> What do you know!
>>>>
>>>> There are 2 different dists for 68k (020 and higher) macs.
>>>>
>>>> Running and serving around the world.
>>>>
>>>> BSD is more popular.
>>>>
>>>> Btw, I don't mean to offend.
>>>>
>>>> Grant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> There also is a close-to-booting Linux/Mac68K version that runs on
>>>>>the 68K
>>>>> Macs. That kernel might work too. But then again, was the 89/92
>>>>>processor
>>>>> really a Motorola 68K?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> M M IIIII TTTTT CCC H H OOO
>>>>> MM MM I T C C H H O O
>>>>> M M M I T C HHHHH O O
>>>>> M M I T C C H H O O
>>>>> M M IIIII T CCC H H OOO
>>>>>
>>>>> "Do what you can,with what you have,where you are" -***** Roosevelt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> on 01/08/2000 08:48 PM, Jimmy Baker at ashbar83@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a TI89/92(+) version to be exact. Basically, if you
>>>>>> could install Linux on your calc, and configure it
>>>>>> right, you could do a whole lot with it. If we could
>>>>>> run a modified Linux, we would effectively turn it
>>>>>> into a full featured palmtop computer with more
>>>>>> functionality and power than the Palm. It would make
>>>>>> development a lot easier, for one thing. Just some
>>>>>> thoughts...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jimmy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- Dines Justesen <dines@aub.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am guessing that you are suggesting a Ti9x linux
>>>>>>> version, true? It would
>>>>>>> be cool to have a version of linux on your calc, but
>>>>>>> it really be that
>>>>>>> useful? How often do you need multitasking and other
>>>>>>> functions like that,
>>>>>>> and what would it do which the shell doesn't already
>>>>>>> do?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dines
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Jimmy Baker" <ashbar83@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> To: <shell-developers@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: 7. januar 2000 05:07
>>>>>>> Subject: SD: Linux 68k?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's try this again. this page has source to a
>>>>>>>> bootable Linux port to an Atari ST.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~pcoene/index.html
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>>>>> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>>>>>>> http://im.yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>>> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>>>>> http://im.yahoo.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
References: