Re: SD: Re: Linux 68k?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: SD: Re: Linux 68k?




yes, the linux-m68k kernel is close to booting. you must be talking about
something else. I know BSD is more popular. I use it too.

-- 
M   M IIIII TTTTT  CCC  H   H  OOO
MM MM   I     T   C   C H   H O   O
M M M   I     T   C     HHHHH O   O
M   M   I     T   C   C H   H O   O
M   M IIIII   T    CCC  H   H  OOO

"Microsoft;  It's time to call that lame, hack of a company what it is:  a
lame, hack of a company."  - Prison Guy (Rob), Editor, MacAddict

on 01/08/2000 09:20 PM, Grant Stockly at gussie@stockly.com wrote:

> 
> Close to booting!&?!
> 
> What do you know!
> 
> There are 2 different dists for 68k (020 and higher) macs.
> 
> Running and serving around the world.
> 
> BSD is more popular.
> 
> Btw, I don't mean to offend.
> 
> Grant
> 
> 
>> There also is a close-to-booting Linux/Mac68K version that runs on the 68K
>> Macs.  That kernel might work too.  But then again, was the 89/92 processor
>> really a Motorola 68K?
>> 
>> --
>> M   M IIIII TTTTT  CCC  H   H  OOO
>> MM MM   I     T   C   C H   H O   O
>> M M M   I     T   C     HHHHH O   O
>> M   M   I     T   C   C H   H O   O
>> M   M IIIII   T    CCC  H   H  OOO
>> 
>> "Do what you can,with what you have,where you are" -***** Roosevelt
>> 
>> 
>> on 01/08/2000 08:48 PM, Jimmy Baker at ashbar83@yahoo.com wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> a TI89/92(+) version to be exact. Basically, if you
>>> could install Linux on your calc, and configure it
>>> right, you could do a whole lot with it. If we could
>>> run a modified Linux, we would effectively turn it
>>> into a full featured palmtop computer with more
>>> functionality and power than the Palm. It would make
>>> development a lot easier, for one thing. Just some
>>> thoughts...
>>> 
>>> Jimmy
>>> 
>>> --- Dines Justesen <dines@aub.dk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I am guessing that you are suggesting a Ti9x linux
>>>> version, true? It would
>>>> be cool to have a version of linux on your calc, but
>>>> it really be that
>>>> useful? How often do you need multitasking and other
>>>> functions like that,
>>>> and what would it do which the shell doesn't already
>>>> do?
>>>> 
>>>> Dines
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Jimmy Baker" <ashbar83@yahoo.com>
>>>> To: <shell-developers@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>> Sent: 7. januar 2000 05:07
>>>> Subject: SD: Linux 68k?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let's try this again. this page has source to a
>>>>> bootable Linux port to an Atari ST.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~pcoene/index.html
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>>>> http://im.yahoo.com
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>> http://im.yahoo.com
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 



Follow-Ups: References: