RE: LZ-Adv: JR or JP cc, *

Subject: RE: LZ-Adv: JR or JP cc, *
From: C.J. Oster <cjo@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 23:17:14 -0600
In-Reply-To: <>

>But if you're using jump tables, and replacing the addresses in the
>opcodes at the starting of the program, then I think JP (without any
>conditional statements) is 2 T-states faster than JR.  If there are
>conditional statements, then they are the same speed (but JP still has the
>advantage of more possible condition statements, such as PO, PE, P, amd
>M).


Again, yes, but two t-states at like a hundred-thousand per second is not
much faster.


                                   -C.J.-






********************************************************************
Unsolicited commercial e-mail to the poster of this message
will be proofread at $70/hr, minimum charge $150.  Submission
of such e-mail to this address will suffice as contractual assent
to the said charging schedule.
********************************************************************