Thanks to the original poster for observing this -- always nice to have a few examples handy of why the human operator has to be the boss when running power tools. It is going to be possible to "trick" any given rule-driven set of instructions, though naturally systems in common use are going to get smarter and smarter over time. I think adding in a back-tracking routine is needed here. Given the clue this example provides, no doubt it would be possible to come up with a whole range of situations where the only way to get the calculator to perform would be for the user to first make a strategic substitution.
Here's a related question: can we make the TI-89 perform this substitution and come up with the desired result "in front of our eyes"? Entering (2x-2)*e^(x^2-2x)|x^2-2x=u yields (2x-2)*e^u, and what command could we then enter to obtain the desired antiderivative?
RWW Taylor
National Technical Institute
for the Deaf
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester NY 14623
>>>> The plural of mongoose begins with p. <<<<
Brian Hinkle wrote:
Maybe because it takes human intelligence and creativity to do u-subsitution. Ask the programmers - it might be that the processer simply isn't powerful enough to do something like that. Brian Hinkle----- Original Message -----From: Roland AntakiSent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 11:44 AMSubject: integralHello,My name is Carl Antaki.I would like to know why thi TI-89 AMS 2.05 HW-2 don't giveme the integral of (x-1)*e^(x^2-2x).Is it because the C.A.S is feeble or what?The solution is really simple:(1/2)*e^(x^2-2x).Thank you a lot in advance.