Re: The Repulsive Design of the 89

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: The Repulsive Design of the 89
From: Kirk Lane <snake64@GEOCITIES.COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:28:55 -0700
Organization: Internet Access Inc. NetA.Com
References: <7c7ihq$m1s$1@east43.supernews.com> <36E84FFA.27E1DD8D@nospam.visi.com>
Reply-To: Kirk Lane <snake64@GEOCITIES.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:28398

Holy crap....much different than my good old TI35X that I must have used for
3 years before Alg34 and my now-trustier 83 (my younger brother got the 35X,
and he'll get the 83 when I get an 86...)

--
Kirk Lane
snake64@geocities.com
ICQ: 28171652

ToddEStan wrote in message <36E84FFA.27E1DD8D@nospam.visi.com>...
>BTW, I almost forgot:  Anybody think the new TI-30 II is really ugly?
>Check it out:
>
>http://www.ti.com/calc/docs/30xiis.htm
>
>Todd
>
>--
>
>Spam filters in place.  If you are accidently blocked, remove nospam.

References:

The Repulsive Design of the 89

From: Steve <redled@PEAKACCESS.NET>

Re: The Repulsive Design of the 89

From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>