Re: 89 or 92 and EE

Re: 89 or 92 and EE

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: 89 or 92 and EE
• From: Silent <soldevi@USXCHANGE.NET>
• Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 13:24:39 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <199906111027.DAA06309@www1.xoommail.com>
• Reply-To: Silent <soldevi@USXCHANGE.NET>

At 06:27 AM 6/11/1999 , you wrote:

I'm not going to pit the 89 vs the 92, but in my opinion the TI-89 is the
better
choice.  It has a much smaller size, practically the same functionality as the
TI-92 (with the exception of the Geometry, which I have yet to see anyone
use), more memory, easier to see screen, more widely accepted for tests,
and its cheaper.

Doesn't seem to be too hard a decision, unless you want to lug around a box
everywhere you go.

******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************

• Re: 89 or 92 and EE
• From: "Miroslaw J. Wiechowski" <mjw@BAHNHOF.SE>

• Prev: Re: Passing a function to a function (TI89)
• Next: Re: 89 or 92 and EE
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread