Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
I agree.
We could really use if Erable would be able to calculate with haeviside and
delta functions.
Wonder what the reason why it was left out was? Probavly time at the moment.
Ice
ask skrev i meddelelsen <78a0vl$229i$1@news-inn.inet.tele.dk>...
>LaPlace92 and DiffEq92 are almost identical. In the beginning DiffEq92 was
a
>special version of LaPlace92, designed to solve differential equations, but
>now LaPlace92 contain the same functions.
>
>This debate, as I see, is must of all about ideology. HP users want to
>propagate something ? It looks like that these tests was maid, so that it
>would fit there needs. The conclusion was, shall we say subjective. I will
>give an example. Maybe Erable is faster than LaPlace92, but Erable's
>invLaPlace could not solve one out of four equations (25%). Erable can not
>transform Heaviside and delta functions, LaPlace92/DiffEq92 can.
>
>Lars Frederiksen
References: