Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
I thought that the whole idea of this list was about TI's, not HPs. As I
recall, i think that there was no mention of HPs at all in this list.
Frankly, (and i speak for probably more than myself), who gives a rat's ass
about HP and whether it is better or not. If I wanted an HP, I would have
bought one. Lets talk about the TI's.
We signed up for intelligent commentary on the TI product line, not HP. So
if you "HP is way better blah blah" guys are jealous, you can probably start
your own list at listbot.com or something.
Peace Out.
-----Original Message-----
From: Randolph J. Herber <herber@DCDRJH.FNAL.GOV>
To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM <CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM>
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
>In article <36A2BA80.BB91180@xmissionnospam.com>,
>Thanh Nguyen <midvale@xmissionNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>So what? I'm sure the TI89 is faster than the HP48 at almost everything!
>>However, the HP48 is at least 8 years old and the TI89 is less than one.
I
>>think that's pathetic, someone who buys a TI has to wait 8 years to buy
>>something that beats the HP. That's not completely true either,
considering
>>many people, including me, still like the HP48 over the TI89 (I've used
the
>TI92
>>for a few weeks) and the HP can still do many things that the TI can't.
>>Anyways, the HP calculator is a solid investment, and when/if HP comes out
>with
>>a newer version, I'll be investing in 2 of those as well.
>>
>
> ...
>
>OK, how about _inverse_ Laplace transforms?
>
>The HP48 with Erable does that. I have not determined how to get the
>TI-89 to do inverse Laplace transforms as of yet (I had found the
>first two method of doing Laplace transforms on the TI-89).
>
>Randolph J. Herber, herber@dcdrjh.fnal.gov, +1 630 840 2966, CD/CDFTF
PK-149F,
>Mail Stop 318, Fermilab, Kirk & Pine Rds., PO Box 500, Batavia, IL
60510-0500,
>USA. (Speaking for myself and not for US, US DOE, FNAL nor URA.) (Product
,
>trade, or service marks herein belong to their respective owners.)
>