Re: Fwd: TI SUCKS!!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Fwd: TI SUCKS!!
I would like to point out that www.hpcalc.org is maintained by just ONE
person, while www.ticalc.org is maintained by a WHOLE STAFF (12 people). I
could see how one site could easily get more hits than another. It isn't
popularity that determines one thing better than another.
-Ben Moss
p.s. Although I do like HP calculators best, I'm not trying to "prove"
hp's better than ti's or anything; I just wanted to point out an error in
philosophy (in my opinion).
At 05:33 PM 1/19/99 EST, you wrote:
>
>From: Jeanne9005@aol.com
>Return-path: <Jeanne9005@aol.com>
>To: TI_Bomberman@YAHOO.COM
>Subject: Re: TI SUCKS!!
>Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:30:46 EST
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>
>OK, lets try this. The HP is faster and much better at many things than the
>TI's. But you all keep bitchin that "Oh, the HP's processor is 8 years
>old...." Blah, the z80 is over 25 years old. So what?!? They are both good
>in their own respects. Think of it this way. The HP is loved by millions,
>right? The TI's are loved by millions, right? The way to settle this is to
>look at the number of hits on the respectful .org homepages, those being
>hpcalc.org and ticalc.org. Unless I'm severly mistaken, there are more hits
>on ticalc.org every week than hpcalc.org has had since they started. TI
>FOREVER!!!
>
>
>In a message dated 1/19/99 5:09:00 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
>TI_Bomberman@YAHOO.COM writes:
>
>> TI SUCKS!! HP RULES!!!!!!
>
===
/////////////////////////////////
// Ben Moss, KC0DOD //
// benm@rollanet.org //
// www.rollanet.org/~benm //
/////////////////////////////////
Follow-Ups:
References: