Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 02:39:53 GMT
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
References: <77tjoa$53e$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <dMso2.5$di2.131706@client.news.psi.net>
Reply-To: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu comp.sys.hp48:73595 bit.listserv.calc-ti:27408 sci.math:228505

In article <dMso2.5$di2.131706@client.news.psi.net>,
  "SPUI" <dem@moraseski.REMOVEima-net.com> wrote:
> You missed another conclusion: the TI-89 is faster than the HP-48.

:oD

This is my conclusion:
The best method I know today to solve LT in TI89 works equally or faster in
almost all cases than the best method I know today to solve LT in HP48.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Follow-Ups:

Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

From: Manuel Pedro Cunha <m_7441@UBISTC.UBI.PT>

References:

LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>

Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

From: SPUI <dem@MORASESKI.REMOVEIMA-NET.COM>

Prev: Chem-Engineering using TI???
Next: *.92T files for Ti92, header composition?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread