Re: Which TI should I get?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Which TI should I get?
I think that ice is your problem!!:::: yep!...
I think that your talking about probably model 85 ,..no!????
Have you tryed TI-89!???,....
When i execute this in myne models 92 and 89....
(just an simple example for you to compare HP-48XXX with TI-89 or 9XXX)
.
Integral(x^2*sin(x),x) |x^2*sin(x)dx=(2-x^2)cos(x)+2x*sin(x)....
- What does your HP answers you!???...
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Steen Schmidt wrote:
> >Anyways, the HP processor runs at 4Mhz. TI processors run at 2, but they're
> >built for 6. When you divide my PRIME6 times in half (to simulate 4Mhz),
> you'll
> >see that they are FASTER than the User RPL program. That's my algorithm and
> >TI-BASIC swiftness at work. The other programs are ASM.
> >
>
>
> So you mean that you can equal clockcycles with instructions executed on any
> CPU?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> And as far as I remember it was you who stood up and claimed that you would
> like to see a HP beat your program for a while back.
> Well......have a look.
>
> Asembler isn't cheating.........it's just fast. Why don't you port your
> program to TI's asembler (or get someone to do it for you) - that would
> speed things up considerably.
> But please - stop comparing old TI calculators (or any TI's for that matter)
> with HP machines. TI calcs have always been, and will always be, inferior to
> HP.
>
> Ice
>
References: