Re: TI-89 and AP Test

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-89 and AP Test
From: Peter Ammon <Peter_Ammon@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 20:40:05 +0000
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
References: <3682B3DB.482E3A51@rocketmail.com> <3683e3b4.11799566@news.erols.com> <3683E5C9.C0D28FE2@mindless.com> <36844e6f.353649@news.erols.com>
Reply-To: Peter_Ammon@rocketmail.com
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27109 sci.math:227206

Um, why would you ignore me?  Did I do something wrong?  Is it the
cross-posting;
I felt the message was relevant to both newsgroups.

In any case, I had forgotten about the HPs; the learning curve proved too steep
for my friend.

Glad I took it before the 89s came out.

-Peter

Rahat Husain wrote:

> The obvious solution is to ignore the original poster of this message.
>
> On Fri, 25 Dec 1998 14:21:46 -0500, DaMaStErMiNd
> <damastermind@mindless.com> wrote:
>
> >cuz not everybody has an 89! hmmm I don't know why the 89 should be banned
if
> >
> >the HPs are just as capable with the plethora of libs they have, and have
> >been allowed
> >for years.
> >
> >Rahat Husain wrote:
> >
> >> Why don't they just make the AP harder?
> >>

References:

TI-89 and AP Test

From: Peter Ammon <Peter_Ammon@rocketmail.com>

Re: TI-89 and AP Test

From: Rahat Husain <rahusain@EROLS.KOM>

Re: TI-89 and AP Test

From: DaMaStErMiNd <damastermind@MINDLESS.COM>

Re: TI-89 and AP Test

From: Rahat Husain <rahusain@EROLS.KOM>